Archive for the ‘Characterization’ Category

Character Development

Monday, March 23rd, 2009

QUESTION (from a mystery writer client): You suggested to me to have same trait or unique aspect to my main character. The interest, hobby, talent, foible, quirky, fun thing that pulls my character out of stereotype and into memorable: should it impact his job? Or is it just part of his personality that makes him memorable, but doesn’t really have anything to do with the plot line?

ANSWER: Everything about any personality somehow effects a person’s job. Even cultivating orchids. Think of the traits involved for the hobby of orchid enthusiast: patience (infinite, since they take forever to grow!), a gentle touch (delicate plants), and an eye of details (each cultivator has very subtle color and pattern differences). So these are 3 traits that DO help a main character in their job even if it isn’t directly related to running down a culprit. And any one of these 3 traits could become the deciding factor in the cop resolving a mystery.

BOTTOMLINE: YOU know your main character, I don’t. What might this man do on the sly, something he wouldn’t want anyone to know about (might seem too sissy or odd to others)? Or what might he want to be known for (the would-be singer or artist or whatever)? Or what calms and centers him when he’s off-duty? It needs to fit what you already have for him. And the traits that make him good at this unique and interesting thing should translate to traits that make him a good cop too.

HINT: Use the right-side menu and click through on Characterization in the bottom list. You’ll find the original article I wrote to this same client explaining more in-depth about character quirks, etc.

Character Traits vs. Background

Saturday, January 31st, 2009

QUESTION (from one of my clients):  I was trying to think of things that would make my character unique but every time I think of something, I think, “Yeah, but lots of other people do these things, too. These aren’t all that unique.” Exactly HOW different and quirky should this interesting thing be? For instance, Nero Wolfe is obese and loves order, routine, and orchids. And Stephanie Plum is clumsy, had a hamster for a pet. But am I shooting for something like ‘weaves baskets out of homegrown reeds’ or ‘likes to dress up in medieval costumes twice a week and re-enact jousting battles’ ? Or am I taking something that is fairly normal, but adding it to his personality makes HIM more than normal?

ANSWER: Finding something unique does NOT have to be something off-the-wall weird. And even what might be considered “normal” hobbies can vary.

WHAT’S THE NORM? For instance, how many people do YOU know who cultivate orchids or (an adult) who owns a hamster? I know OF such people, but I don’t know one myself. So these are, yes, considered normal hobbies, but not so normal that every reader will know someone with that exact pastime. On the other hand, I DO happen to know two people who weave baskets from their own grown or collected materials PLUS a couple who participate in medieval fairs. So … what is and isn’t normal in a hobby is a matter of perspective–and your own acquaintances.

What matters is that you find a hobby or interest for your main character that fits that character’s overall personality. Something that readers say, “Well sure, considering how he does things at work the way he does, it makes sense he’d do this on the weekends.”

TRAITS vs. BACKGROUND: Some writers get traits (individual personality talents or quirks) confused with background. People in certain careers often share similar backgrounds. Any background you’ve seen more than a couple times (for instance, with a cop or detective: loner, military background, stickler for routine, past injury, etc.) can be okay to use again but do it with variations or down-played.

Why? Because they ARE typical of the type of person who becomes a cop. Many are loners (the job doesn’t make for a great family life), many have military pasts (as do many others who enter a service career after the military). They better be able to handle routine, because the job entails more routine than most people know. And any physically active person–which most cops are at least to start with–is likely to have had an injury, whether in sports, the military or on-the-job. Not all those in this career will have these backgrounds, but many will.

CONCLUSION: So one or more of these backgrounds is fine–each is typical and fits the role–but none are unique.

But what you need to ALSO find is another and unique hobby/trait that makes this character stand out. Something that pushes the envelope a bit, yes, but not so over-the-edge that readers groan when they hear it. Give him a pet, but instead of a dog or cat make it something unique. Have him talented in some unusual instrument or unlikely artform. Let him be haunted by something really great in his past (a twist on something really bad) that makes him edgey for some reason in the presnt. Or have him letter-perfect in details–but only in some areas and completely forgetful in others.

Whatever this unique trait is, make it an important part of him, whether he lets others know about it or keeps it a secret.

Character’s Inner Growth vs. Plot’s Outer Resolution

Saturday, September 20th, 2008

Question from a Fiction Writer:
Can you show more about including Inner Growth vs. Outer Resolution in a story?

Answer:
A great story building tool is to create characters who grow in some way through and because of the resolution of the story. In other words, if your characters simply solve their problems and are alive and well at the end, well, that is nice. Fine. But not strong. As a fiction editor, I find many writers plunge characters through all sorts of turmoil but often forget that an inner challenge needs to be part of a strong story too.

What makes a story strong and one that readers really relate to, is one where the characters grow or change because of their plight as well as because of the plot’s resolution. Back to that “children lost in the woods” example I gave a couple of blogs back, maybe the boy doesn’t feel his expertise in survival skills (which he tends to enjoy showing off to anyone who will listen–and a few who don’t want to!) is appreciated. But in the end he not only helps them all survive because of his knowledge but realizes these are NOT bits of knowledge to spout off to impress people—they are valuable aids to survival. He has matured, grown.

Maybe it is his dad who is the survival expert and who has tried to teach the boy these skills. Only the boy has only been half-listening, half-interested. Early in the story the father might press the boy to recall that knowledge, and the boy only half-heartedly tries. Yet when the skills his father has taught him later actually pay off in their survival, he has learned that his father’s advice wasn’t just so much talk, but meant as life-saving tools. He appreciates his dad and that knowledge now—he has matured and grown.

These are two examples of how traits starting at the very beginning of the story can fit into the plot later. Plus those same traits and how they work into the plot can show inner growth for the character as the outer problem is resolved.

Kind of a yin and yang of fiction writing and plotting: Inner problem becomes part of the resolution of the external crisis. And that resolution becomes an aid to dealing with and handling that inner problem.

Have any questions? Write to me, Sandra Haven, Fiction Editor, at Bristol Services Intl. by clicking: services@bristolservicesintl.com